ArticleBMC health services research2026
Addressing health equity through healthcare social enterprises: a qualitative multiple case study of service delivery strategies in Malaysia.
Article in BMC health services research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPersistent inequities in healthcare access continue to affect underserved populations in low- and middle-income countries, including Malaysia. While social enterprises are increasingly recognised for their contributions to healthcare delivery, their role in addressing systemic service gaps and promoting equity remains underexplored. This study examines how healthcare social enterprises in Malaysia develop and operationalise approaches intended to reduce access barriers related to affordability, service availability, and distribution within the country’s dual-tier health system.
methodA qualitative multiple case study approach was employed, involving seven healthcare social enterprises in Malaysia. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews with key informants comprising the founders or chief officers of each social enterprise, from September 2021 to June 2022. Cases were selected using purposive sampling based on active involvement in health service delivery, with inclusion criteria: [1] registered SEs; [2] offering direct health-related services. Interview transcripts were analysed using thematic analysis to identify cross-case patterns in how SEs address health inequities.
resultsFour key strategies were identified. First, community-driven models tailored to local needs helped expand access and reduce affordability barriers. Second, social enterprises managed resources strategically by investing in human capital, applying cross-subsidisation, and adopting hybrid revenue streams. Third, partnerships with government, civil society, and private sector actors supported resource mobilisation and service expansion. Finally, digital platforms and mobile tools were used to improve healthcare access, continuity, and outreach, particularly in underserved areas. Collectively, these approaches highlight how social enterprises operate as adaptive, mission-driven entities that respond to structural healthcare gaps through innovative and inclusive service delivery models.
conclusionHealthcare social enterprises in Malaysia employ practical strategies to reduce disparities in healthcare access, affordability, and service distribution by integrating community responsiveness, strategic resource management, and technological solutions. Their hybrid approaches offer a complementary role to public health systems. However, sustained progress toward health equity will require stronger institutional support, including policy alignment and tailored financing mechanisms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.