ReviewOrphanet journal of rare diseases2026
Advances in hereditary angioedema in the modern treatment era in China: a focus on diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis.
Review in Orphanet journal of rare diseases, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundHereditary angioedema (HAE) is a rare, potentially life-threatening genetic disorder that is caused by C1-inhibitor (C1INH) deficiency or dysfunction. This scoping review sought to map recent advances in the management of HAE among patients in China. MATERIALS AND
methodsA comprehensive literature search was conducted using relevant keywords across the databases PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, ClinicalTrial.gov, and Chinese databases such as the China National Knowledge Infrastructure and Wanfang. The search covered publications from database inception through September 2024. Data was extracted on patient characteristics, disease manifestations, diagnostic approaches, treatments, clinical outcomes, and quality of life (QoL). The selection of articles followed predefined inclusion criteria and was conducted in adherence to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines.
resultsA total of 92 articles were included in this scoping review. Across the literature, the diagnosis of HAE was primarily based on serum complement assessment, particularly measurements of C4 and C1INH levels, along with family history and clinical manifestations. Danazol was reported as the primary treatment in previous studies; however, more recent studies emphasized the increasing use of lanadelumab and icatibant. Icatibant was shown to provide rapid symptom relief during acute HAE attacks, whereas lanadelumab demonstrated effectiveness as a long-term prophylactic therapy by reducing the frequency of attacks. The reviewed studies indicated fewer HAE-related deaths reported in studies published after 2021 compared with previous studies (129 deaths reported up to 2021; five deaths reported between 2021 and September 2024). This reduction may be attributed to increased disease awareness, earlier diagnosis, and advances in therapeutic management. In parallel, several studies reported improvements in angioedema-related quality of life (QoL) scores among patients with HAE in China.
conclusionEmerging therapies such as lanadelumab and icatibant are effective in reducing the frequency of attacks and providing rapid symptom relief in Chinese patients with HAE. Nevertheless, further research is warranted to optimize HAE management strategies and to address existing gaps in the evidence within the Chinese population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.