ArticleBMC health services research2026
Understanding health system reconstruction in conflict-affected states: a repeated cross-sectional study of healthcare coverage trends in Rwanda.
Article in BMC health services research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHealth systems are often a casualty of conflict, with widespread disruption caused by the loss of infrastructure, resources, and the workforce. The recovery of these systems, termed reconstruction or rehabilitation, is crucial to national recovery, but our understanding of this process remains limited. Rwanda experienced conflict in the form of genocide in 1994 which devastated the healthcare system. They have since made significant progress in health system development, providing a key case study to further our understanding of health system reconstruction. This paper aims to use a quantitative, health system-focused method to analyse the recovery of the Rwandan health system.
methodsThis study uses a repeated cross-sectional design to examine trends in essential healthcare coverage in Rwanda, based on Demographic and Health Survey data between 1990 and 2019. Measures of maternal health provision were used as proxy markers for essential healthcare coverage. Trends were visualized using basis splines, and significant breaks were tested using post-estimation Wald tests. Piecewise beta linear regressions were used to clarify changes in trend.
resultsConsistent trends across proxy markers demonstrate that healthcare coverage is decreased after conflict. Following a post-conflict lag of 3-10 years, healthcare coverage undergoes a marked increase in a rehabilitation phase present for all proxy markers. After 2011, healthcare coverage plateaus at a high level, providing evidence for a sustainable development phase in Rwanda’s post-conflict recovery. Primary care markers show increased coverage earlier than secondary care markers.
conclusionThe example of Rwanda suggests that key strategies for successful post-conflict reconstruction may include investment into primary care, early adoption of sustainable solutions, and strong internal co-ordination of reconstruction. Analysis of health system reconstruction should use health system-based approaches, and longer time frames of analysis. Further research should aim to create evidence-based resources that aid recently conflict-affected states.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.