ArticleBMC complementary medicine and therapies2026
Anticancer potential of Curcuma caesia: induction of DNA damage and apoptosis in cervical cancer.
Article in BMC complementary medicine and therapies, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Identification of the immunoprotective activity of Mori Cortex Radicis ethanol extract against aquaculture pathogens (Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCervical cancer remains the fourth most common malignancy among women worldwide, with limited therapeutic success in advanced and recurrent stages. Conventional treatments, including radiotherapy and chemotherapeutic agents are often limited by off-target toxicity and poor selectivity toward malignant cells. Considering growing interest in phytotherapeutics, the present study evaluates the cytotoxic and genotoxic effects of methanolic extract of Curcuma caesia (MECC) on cervical cancer cells.
methodsHuman cervical cancer cell lines (HeLa and SiHa) and non-cancerous HEK293T cells were treated with varying concentrations of MECC. Cell viability, proliferation, and oxidative stress were assessed via MTT, cell cycle analysis, and ROS quantification, respectively. DNA damage and repair responses were evaluated using COMET, TUNEL, and γH2A.X foci assays. Senescence was detected by β-galactosidase staining, while apoptotic and DNA damage response proteins were examined through Western blotting.
resultsMECC exhibited dose-dependent cytotoxicity in HeLa and SiHa cells while sparing HEK293T cells, indicating selectivity toward malignant cells. Treatment induced cell cycle arrest and significantly reduced intracellular ROS levels. DNA damage was evident from increased comet tail moments, TUNEL positivity, and nuclear accumulation of γH2A.X. MECC further promoted apoptosis, as demonstrated by elevated levels of cleaved caspase-3, Bax, cleaved PARP1, and reduced Bcl-2 expression. Concurrent induction of cellular senescence was also observed.
conclusionMECC induces apoptosis and senescence, through modulation of oxidative stress and induction of DNA damage in cervical cancer cells. This highlights its potential as a plant-based therapeutic candidate with reduced cytotoxicity toward non-cancerous cells.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.