ArticleBMC public health2026
Qualitative evidence for the determinants of deaths of despair: a scoping review.
Article in BMC public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDeaths from suicide, drug overdose, and alcohol-specific causes, collectively termed “deaths of despair” (DoD), represent a growing public health concern. Quantitative research has linked these deaths to adverse social and economic conditions but less is known about how their determinants are understood and articulated within qualitative research. This scoping review aimed to map the existing qualitative evidence on the perceived determinants of DoD.
methodsA scoping review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA-ScR guidelines. We searched CINAHL, Scopus, and Ovid Medline for qualitative studies published in English from 2015 onwards and conducted in OECD countries. Studies were included if they explored perceptions or beliefs related to the determinants of suicide, drug overdose, alcohol-specific mortality, or DoD collectively. Data were extracted and synthesised using a narrative thematic approach.
resultsOf 3292 unique records identified, nine papers representing six distinct qualitative studies met the inclusion criteria. Studies were conducted in the United States, the United Kingdom, and Canada. Three overarching themes were identified: structural determinants (including economic insecurity, deindustrialisation, and limited access to services), social determinants (including weakened community cohesion, gender norms, stigma, and discrimination), and individual-level experiences (including psychological distress, hopelessness, and barriers to help-seeking).
conclusionsThe qualitative evidence base on the determinants of deaths of despair is sparse and uneven. Existing studies situate DoD within broader structural and social contexts, highlighting the role of economic decline, service withdrawal, and social fragmentation in shaping pathways to distress, substance use, and self-harm. Further qualitative research across more diverse populations and settings is urgently needed to strengthen understanding of the mechanisms underpinning these deaths and to inform effective, upstream public health policy responses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.