Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41862848›Full record

ArticleBMC primary care2026

How does Australian primary care face dementia? Identifying current practice and barriers in dementia diagnosis and management in Australian primary care - a qualitative interview study.

Lee-Fay Low, Caroline Gibson, Annica Barcenilla-Wong, Sharon Daniel, Lyn Phillipson, Meredith Gresham, Kate Laver, Edwin Tan, Stephanie Daly, Constance Dimity Pond and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC primary care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Lee-Fay LowFaculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia. lee-fay.low@sydney.edu.au.
Caroline GibsonFaculty of Health, School of Medicine, Deakin University, Ballarat, Australia.
Annica Barcenilla-WongFaculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Sharon DanielFaculty of Health, School of Medicine, Deakin University, Ballarat, Australia.
Lyn PhillipsonFaculty of Arts, Social Sciences and Humanities, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia.
Meredith GreshamFaculty of Arts, Social Sciences and Humanities, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia.
Kate LaverCollege of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia.
Edwin TanFaculty of Medicine and Health, School of Pharmacy, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Stephanie DalyAustralian Centre for Evidence Based Aged Care, Latrobe University, Melbourne, Australia.
Constance Dimity PondWicking Dementia Research and Teaching Centre, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Australia.
Jamie SwannSchool of Health and Social Development, Health Services and Digital Innovation, Deakin University, Burwood, Australia.
Mark YatesFaculty of Health, School of Medicine, Deakin University, Ballarat, Australia.

Funding

Medical Research Future Fund APP 2015770
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrimary care is increasingly tasked with early detection, diagnosis, and management of dementia. Despite policy initiatives, education investments, and development of diagnostic and care pathways in Australia and globally, dementia care in primary care settings remains sub-optimal. This study is part of a bigger project titled Facing Dementia Together, comprising a primary care practice change program and a public help-seeking campaign, aimed at improving timely detection and management of dementia in primary care. A core element of intervention research is understanding the context in which the intervention is to be developed, implemented and evaluated. The aim of this study is to identify current practice and barriers to dementia identification, diagnosis and management in primary care in two regions in Australia.

methodsA qualitative design with semi-structured interviews was used. The interview guide was informed by projective techniques using hypothetical scenarios. A convenience sample of 18 key primary care stakeholders were recruited through the Western Victoria and Western Sydney Primary Health Networks located in two different states of Australia. DATA ANALYSIS: Data was thematically analysed following Braun and Clarke’s six steps of thematic analysis The socioecological model was used to guide the development of themes.

resultsFour themes described current primary care practitioner practices in dementia diagnosis and management (1) Family concern triggers dementia investigation (2) GPs delay conversations about dementia (3) Completing routine cognitive assessments in the 75+ health assessment, and (4) Variability in post-diagnostic care. Barriers to identifying, diagnosing, and managing dementia were organised according to the levels of the socioecological framework: ‘There is not much we can do’ (individual), ‘A difficult conversation’ (Interpersonal), ‘Hierarchy affects team communication’ (Organisational), ‘It’s hard to get services’ (Community) and ‘If it’s not financially viable, it won’t be done’ (Policy).

conclusionEnhancing care for people living with dementia and their carers requires multifaceted interventions that not only strengthen the capability and motivation of primary care practitioners, but also address intrapersonal, community, organisational, and policy-related challenges. The findings of this study inform the Facing Dementia Together primary care practice change intervention to improve early dementia diagnosis and management in primary care.

Indexed as

DementiaPrimary Health CareAccess to Primary CareAustraliaFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMaleQualitative Research

Identifiers

PMID41862848
PMCPMC13126759

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.