ArticleBMC public health2026
Decoding autonomy in digital work: how direct, indirect, and moderated effects shape health and burnout of social workers.
Article in BMC public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe increasing use of digital technologies is reshaping working conditions and employee well-being. Although autonomy is often described as an important resource for digital work-related health, findings remain inconsistent, particularly in health and social work contexts. In these settings, digital work practices are becoming increasingly common, with counselling now frequently conducted by phone, email or video via company-specific online counselling platforms rather than traditional face-to-face methods. This study examines whether and how autonomy is related to health in these digital workplaces through direct, indirect, and moderated associations.
methodsSocial counsellors from a large German social welfare organisation, with varying frequencies of online counselling, completed a cross-sectional, web-based questionnaire assessing autonomy, job demands, resources, work-life balance (WLB), and health outcomes using validated scales. Data analyses included mediation and moderation models to examine indirect and interactional associations.
resultsAutonomy was significantly related to digital counselling frequency, with higher levels of autonomy observed among counsellors who more frequently used digital work practices. Although autonomy was positively correlated with work-related health, the association was not direct. Instead, autonomy’s impact emerged through interactions with specific job demands and resources, significantly buffering negative associations of work interruptions and the work environment with well-being. Moreover, intersectional WLB was identified as a key mediator in the indirect associations between autonomy and health, as well as between autonomy and burnout.
conclusionEnhancing work autonomy can be beneficial in digital social work, as it can promote health and reduce burnout. However, these benefits are context-dependent, underscoring the complexity of digital work settings and the need for careful contextual analysis before implementing workplace interventions. Future research should further explore digital environments prior to enhancing work autonomy, particularly among high-strain employees such as social workers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.