Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41862825›Full record

ArticleBMC geriatrics2026

Lessons learned from social isolation in nursing homes during the COVID-19 epidemic-group interview with relatives with negative experiences.

Brigita Skela-Savič, Sanela Pivač, Allison Squires

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC geriatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Brigita Skela-SavičAngela Boškin Faculty of Health Care, 1 Spodnji Plavž 3, Jesenice, 4270, Slovenia. bskelasavic@fzab.si.ORCID 0000-0002-1028-5383
Sanela PivačAngela Boškin Faculty of Health Care, 1 Spodnji Plavž 3, Jesenice, 4270, Slovenia.
Allison SquiresRory Meyers College of Nursing, New York, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo protect older adults and their rights, social distancing, isolation and quarantine were the key measures put in place to slow down the spread of COVID-19. Yet several studies have highlighted the importance of contact and emotional support from families for residents of long-term care facilities. The purpose of the study was to elicit the experiences and perceptions on the COVID-19 epidemic preventive measures and gain insights into the perspective of people who had family members in Slovenian nursing homes during the pandemic.

methodsA qualitative descriptive research paradigm with social constructivist approach was employed. Due to COVID-related restrictions, the method of formal natural group interview was used to conduct a single group interview. The interview guide comprised five open-ended questions with prompts. A purposive sample of relatives was invited to participate, with 25 out of 34 invited relatives confirming participation. Participants were 50–85 years old and had relatives in nursing homes—most often their parents or, alternatively, their spouses/partners. Three experts facilitated the group interview which was recorded. Transcripts were coded using thematic analysis. Ethical approval was obtained by the lead investigator’s home institution.

resultsData synthesis yielded seven sub-themes and three themes: “Paternalism of authorities and health professionals” (medicine, nursing) towards residents and their relatives; “Negative impact on the health of residents and relatives”; and “The ethics of triage in relation to residents’ hospital access”. Overall, the approaches of those in charge of long-term care facilities were perceived as paternalistic and detrimental to the health and quality of life of nursing home residents during the pandemic.

conclusionsOur findings corroborate other international studies on the issues experienced in long-term care facilities for older adults during the pandemic. Relatives should not be a burden for the nursing home residents and should not feel like a controlling authority, but should be an important factor for the vitality and quality of residents’ lives. Our findings highlight the key role of health professionals in nursing care homes, particularly in terms of taking responsibility for protecting the autonomy and rights of residents and their relatives. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.

Indexed as

COVID-19FamilyNursing HomesPandemicsSocial IsolationAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNursing Home ResidentsQualitative ResearchSARS-CoV-2SloveniaAutonomyCOVID-19Human rightsNursing HomePaternalismPatient rightsRelativesResidentsSocial distanceTriage

Identifiers

PMID41862825
PMCPMC13126787

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.