ArticleBMC geriatrics2026
Intergenerational communication about advance care planning between older adults and their adult children: a qualitative dyadic study.
Article in BMC geriatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveAdvance care planning (ACP) is a process in which older adults with good cognitive ability communicate about end-of-life care with significant others. This study aimed to explore the intergenerational communication of ACP between older adults and their adult children in Taiwan, including their concerns and experiences at the individual and dyadic levels.
methodsThis qualitative dyadic study included older adults and their adult children. Individual semi-structured interviews included their experiences and interactions about ACP, and thematic analysis were conducted.
resultsNine pairs of older adults and children were recruited. Four themes were identified. First, “good death and peace for both sides” indicated agreement between older adults and their children that the goal of ACP was to achieve a good death without increasing physical suffering for older adults or care burden for children. Second, “the foundation of the ACP discussion” focused on the need to consider ACP knowledge and relevant experiences about illness, care, and death. Third, “mutual understanding without direct discussion” suggested that they may not officially and directly discuss ACP, but older adults express their willingness and children may understand and respect this willingness through progressive and casual communication. Finally, “interpersonal relationships and family dynamics” emphasized the influence of close relationships with older adults and family dynamics between siblings on ACP communication.
conclusionDiscussions on ACP occur during casual communication between older adults and their children. This discussion is shaped by ACP knowledge, previous experience with illness and care, trigger events, and family dynamics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.