ArticleBMC plant biology2026
DNA methylation around transcription start sites is not globally associated with transcription in the grain of natural and synthetic hexaploid wheat.
Article in BMC plant biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Nonadditive gene expression and reduced homoeolog expression bias in an intraspecific hexaploid wheat hybrid.BMC plant biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEpigenetic mechanisms including DNA methylation are assumed to play crucial roles in the maintenance of genome integrity, regulation of gene expression and development, and their increasing exploitation in breeding applications is anticipated. However, the relationship between DNA methylation and gene expression remains ambiguous and difficult to generalize. Here we explored the hypothesized causality between the level of transcription and cytosine methylation at the 5’ end of genes (around transcription start sites and start codons) in relation to whole-genome duplication in natural and synthetic allohexaploid wheat (Triticum/Aegilops complex).
resultsUsing transcriptomes and a sequence capture protocol coupled with bisulfite sequencing, we observed sometimes significant, but overall very weak associations between gene expression and 5’ end methylation on a genome-wide scale. In synthetic wheat allohexaploids, global methylation differences between subgenomes are not triggered by the polyploidization, as the subgenome patterns are rather faithfully inherited from parents. A small number of genes differentially methylated between the parents and synthetics was consistently recovered in reciprocal synthetics and subsequent generations. Differences in transcription between homeologs are not clearly associated with 5’ end methylation in either natural or synthetic wheat. Overall, allopolyploidization triggers only minor methylation changes around transcription start sites and start codons of nascent wheat allopolyploids, and these are not statistically associated with differential expression. Although there is a measurable methylation difference between silent and expressed genes in the developing grain, our results do not support the hypothesis that 5’ end DNA methylation is engaged in the regulation of gene expression in natural and synthetic wheat.
conclusionsWhile a ‘genome shock’ hypothesis predicts extensive transcriptomic and epigenetic reorganization after polyploidization, DNA methylation patterns around transcription start sites are generally undisturbed in nascent wheat allohexaploids. Although this stability might indicate importance for gene regulation, a clear relationship between DNA methylation and transcription was not observed either on a genome-wide scale, or among triads of homeologous genes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.