Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41862766›Full record

ArticleForensic science, medicine, and pathology2026

Pesticide-related fatalities referred for diagnostic difficulty: a forensic case series highlighting scene-toxicology discordance.

Mehmet Doğan, Emre Mutlu, Merve Yüksel Akgül, Murat Çapan, İbrahim Üzün

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Forensic science, medicine, and pathology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Mehmet DoğanCouncil of Forensic Medicine, Ministry of Justice, Republic of Türkiye, İstanbul, 34196, Türkiye. drmehmetdoganmd@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3085-734X
Emre MutluCouncil of Forensic Medicine, Ministry of Justice, Republic of Türkiye, İstanbul, 34196, Türkiye.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2772-2364
Merve Yüksel AkgülCouncil of Forensic Medicine, Ministry of Justice, Republic of Türkiye, İstanbul, 34196, Türkiye.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0003-8031-2708
Murat ÇapanCouncil of Forensic Medicine, Ministry of Justice, Forensic Medicine Branch Office, Kırklareli, Türkiye.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0003-3814-1300
İbrahim ÜzünCouncil of Forensic Medicine, Ministry of Justice, Republic of Türkiye, İstanbul, 34196, Türkiye.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7800-8657

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fatal pesticide poisonings pose a persistent medico-legal challenge, particularly when post-mortem toxicological confirmation is inconclusive despite strong circumstantial and clinical evidence. This study aimed to examine forensic decision-making, evidentiary discordance, and toxicological limitations in pesticide-related deaths referred for diagnostic difficulties to the First Forensic Medicine Specialization Board (FFMSB) in Türkiye. A retrospective descriptive forensic case series was examined which included pesticide-related deaths evaluated by the FFSMB of the Council of Forensic Medicine, Türkiye, between 2013 and 2022. Case files were reviewed for sociodemographic data, scene investigation findings, clinical course, autopsy and histopathology results, and post-mortem toxicological analyses across multiple biological matrices. The findings were summarized descriptively with emphasis on the route of pesticide identification and reasons for toxicological non-detection. Fifty-one fatal cases were included. A pesticide product was identified at the death scene in 56.9% of the cases, whereas toxicological analyses confirmed pesticide exposure in 31.4% of the cases. Aluminium phosphide and methomyl were the most frequently detected agents. Toxicological positivity varied by biological matrix, with the highest detection rate in the gastric content, followed by blood and urine. Discordance between circumstantial evidence and toxicological findings was most often associated with agent volatility, rapid metabolism, delayed sampling, prior medical interventions, and limited availability of appropriate matrices. Post-mortem toxicology alone was often insufficient to support medicolegal certification in fatal pesticide poisonings. Accurate determination of cause of death depended on the integrated assessment of scene findings, clinical information, autopsy results, and multimatrix toxicological analyses. These findings highlight the need for standardized scene documentation and systematic forensic evaluation in cases of suspected pesticide-related death.

Indexed as

Aluminium phosphideForensic toxicologyMedicolegal death certificationMultimatrix analysisPesticide poisoningPostmortem examinationScene investigation

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.