ArticleForensic science, medicine, and pathology2026
Pesticide-related fatalities referred for diagnostic difficulty: a forensic case series highlighting scene-toxicology discordance.
Article in Forensic science, medicine, and pathology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Fatal pesticide poisonings pose a persistent medico-legal challenge, particularly when post-mortem toxicological confirmation is inconclusive despite strong circumstantial and clinical evidence. This study aimed to examine forensic decision-making, evidentiary discordance, and toxicological limitations in pesticide-related deaths referred for diagnostic difficulties to the First Forensic Medicine Specialization Board (FFMSB) in Türkiye. A retrospective descriptive forensic case series was examined which included pesticide-related deaths evaluated by the FFSMB of the Council of Forensic Medicine, Türkiye, between 2013 and 2022. Case files were reviewed for sociodemographic data, scene investigation findings, clinical course, autopsy and histopathology results, and post-mortem toxicological analyses across multiple biological matrices. The findings were summarized descriptively with emphasis on the route of pesticide identification and reasons for toxicological non-detection. Fifty-one fatal cases were included. A pesticide product was identified at the death scene in 56.9% of the cases, whereas toxicological analyses confirmed pesticide exposure in 31.4% of the cases. Aluminium phosphide and methomyl were the most frequently detected agents. Toxicological positivity varied by biological matrix, with the highest detection rate in the gastric content, followed by blood and urine. Discordance between circumstantial evidence and toxicological findings was most often associated with agent volatility, rapid metabolism, delayed sampling, prior medical interventions, and limited availability of appropriate matrices. Post-mortem toxicology alone was often insufficient to support medicolegal certification in fatal pesticide poisonings. Accurate determination of cause of death depended on the integrated assessment of scene findings, clinical information, autopsy results, and multimatrix toxicological analyses. These findings highlight the need for standardized scene documentation and systematic forensic evaluation in cases of suspected pesticide-related death.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41862766What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.