Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41862761›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of legal medicine2026

Using all available evidence to solve kinship cases.

Thore Egeland, Franco Marsico

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of legal medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Thore EgelandFaculty of Chemistry, Biotechnology and Food Science, NMBU, Oslo, Norway.
Franco MarsicoFacultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, UBA, Buenos Aires, Argentina. franco.lmarsico@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0740-5516

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Kinship cases, ranging from standard paternity tests to complex disaster victim identifications, are typically evaluated using likelihood ratios (LR) based on forensic genetic markers. However, in some contexts, genetic information alone is not enough to reach conclusive results. This is common when establishing distant familial connections using large DNA-databases, or even in simple cases such as determining which individual is the parent and which is the child in a relationship pair. Although forensic practitioners frequently incorporate supplementary evidence (SE), such as age, biological sex, or phenotypic traits, in these cases, this integration typically occurs informally, without systematic quantitative assessment, compromising procedural transparency and reliability. Here, we present a framework that synthesizes forensic DNA evidence (FDE) with SE through Markov chain models and customized transition matrices designed for various biological traits. This approach generates combined likelihood assessments expressed as LRs or posterior probabilities. Validation through simulated and real-world case studies demonstrates that systematic incorporation of SE improves resolution accuracy in kinship determinations. To facilitate applications, we have implemented this methodology in mispitools, an open-source R package.

Indexed as

DNA FingerprintingForensic GeneticsLikelihood FunctionsPedigreeGenetic MarkersHumansMarkov ChainsPaternitySoftwareGenetic Markers

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.