ArticleInternational journal of legal medicine2026
Age and sex estimation using post-mortem CT scout view.
Article in International journal of legal medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposePost-mortem CT (PMCT) is valuable in mass fatality incidents for identification purposes. The aim of our study is to develop and evaluate the performance of “iml-scout”, a Deep Learning software for estimating age and sex from PMCT scout views. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis retrospective study included consecutive decedents with known age and sex who underwent PMCT from January 2015 to January 2024 (derivation cohort) and February to September 2024 (evaluation cohort). We trained “iml-scout” on 60% of the derivation cohort (training set) to estimate age and sex based on frontal and lateral scout views. Age confidence intervals (95%CI) were derived using quantile regression on the validation set (20% of derivation cohort). In the test set (20% of derivation cohort) and the evaluation cohort, we measured mean absolute error (MAE), concordance correlation coefficient (CCC), percentage of age estimations within the 95% CI, sex classification accuracy, and inference duration.
resultsThe derivation (n = 3008) and evaluation (n = 321) cohorts had median ages of 57 [IQR: 39–71] and 54 [34–70] years, respectively. In the test set (n = 602) and the evaluation cohort, MAE was 6.31 years (95%CI: 5.87–6.75) and 6.57 years (95%CI: 5.96–7.18), with CCC of 0.92 (95%CI: 0.90–0.93) in both. Age estimations were within the 95%CI for respectively 575/602 (95.5%) and 306/321 (95.3%) of cases. Sex classification accuracy was respectively 566/602 (94.0%) and 302/321 (94.1%). Mean inference time was 12.6 ± 0.87 s.
conclusionThe “iml-scout” software enables fast, accurate estimation of age and sex from PMCT scout views.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41862760What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.