Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41862745›Full record

ArticleThe European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care2026

Quality-adjusted life expectancy norms for the Canadian population using EQ-5D-5L and SF-6Dv2.

Hosein Ameri, Thomas G Poder

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Hosein AmeriSchool of Public Health, University of Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Thomas G PoderSchool of Public Health, University of Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada. thomas.poder@umontreal.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7017-096X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundQuality-adjusted life expectancy (QALE) provides a comprehensive measure of population health. Despite its value, QALE norms are not available for the Canadian population. This study aimed to develop age- and sex-specific QALE norms using both the 5-level version of EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L) and version 2 of SF-6D (SF-6Dv2) instruments.

methodsEQ-5D-5L and SF-6Dv2 data from 3,844 individuals in a national survey (2024) were used to derive health utility scores. These scores were then combined with official life tables from the Office for National Statistics (2021–2023) using the Sullivan method to calculate age- and sex-specific QALE. Estimates were produced for both undiscounted and discounted values (1.5%, 3.5%, and 5.0%). Uncertainty was quantified using a Monte Carlo simulation with 10,000 replications.

resultsAcross all ages, EQ-5D-5L utility scores were consistently higher than SF-6Dv2 scores. Women had higher life expectancy (LE) than men across all ages. Undiscounted QALE and QALE at a 1.5% discount rate based on EQ-5D-5L were higher for women, whereas at 3.5% and 5% discount rates they became lower than those of men. In contrast, both undiscounted and discounted QALE based on SF-6Dv2 were consistently higher for men than for women. Overall, SF-6Dv2 produced systematically lower QALE values than EQ-5D-5L. The disparity between LE and QALE was more pronounced in women, highlighting the impact of age-related morbidity.

conclusionsThese results provide the first Canadian QALE norms using both EQ-5D-5L and SF-6Dv2. QALE norms can inform health policy, resource allocation, and equity-sensitive assessments of healthcare interventions in Canada.

Indexed as

CanadaEQ-5D-5LLife expectancyQuality-adjusted life expectancySF-6Dv2Utility scores

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.