Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41862740›Full record

ArticleJournal of community genetics2026

Views and experiences regarding workplace genetic testing: findings from a national survey of U.S. employees.

Drew Blasco, Sarah McCain, Subhamoy Pal, Wendy R Uhlmann, Rebecca Ferber, Kunal Sanghavi, Elizabeth Charnysh, Anya E R Prince, Charles Lee, J Scott Roberts and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of community genetics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Drew BlascoDepartment of Social and Behavioral Health, School of Public Health, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, Las Vegas, Nevada, USA.
Sarah McCainDepartment of Health Behavior & Health Equity, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Subhamoy PalMichigan Alzheimer's Disease Research Center, University of Michigan School of Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Wendy R UhlmannDepartments of Human Genetics and Internal Medicine, University of Michigan School of Medicine, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Rebecca FerberDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan School of Medicine, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Kunal SanghaviThe Jackson Laboratory for Genomic Medicine, Farmington, Connecticut, USA.
Elizabeth CharnyshThe Jackson Laboratory for Genomic Medicine, Farmington, Connecticut, USA.
Anya E R PrinceUniversity of Iowa College of Law, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.
Charles LeeThe Jackson Laboratory for Genomic Medicine, Farmington, Connecticut, USA.
J Scott RobertsDepartment of Health Behavior & Health Equity, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA. jscottr@umich.edu.
INSIGHT @ Work Consortium

Funding

Genetic Counselors and Workplace Genomic TestingR01HG010679 · NHGRI · JACKSON LABORATORY · PI LEE, CHARLES, ROBERTS, SCOTT · 2020 to 2023
$3.7M
University of Michigan Training Program in ELSI ResearchT32HG010030 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI ROBERTS, SCOTT · 2018 to 2022
$962k
NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG010679NHGRI NIH HHS T32 HG010030
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The emergence of voluntary health-related genetic testing in workplace wellness programs indicates a need to understand employees’ views and experiences regarding workplace genetic testing (wGT). A large, diverse national sample of employed adults (N=2000; median age=43 years; 51.1% female; 33% non-white) completed a web survey of their wGT views and experiences. Although 80% of participants indicated their employer did not offer wGT, 54.1% were interested in testing, especially (somewhat/very) for cancer (89.2%), heart disease (93.1%), and Alzheimer’s disease (85.3%). Characteristics associated with wGT interest included younger age (<55 years), Hispanic/Latino ethnicity, genetic testing experience or familiarity, and a positive family medical history (all p<0.05). Reasons for pursuing wGT (e.g., inform health behaviors) were endorsed more frequently than reasons for declining (e.g., insurance/employability concerns). Among participants offered wGT (20%), 60% indicated having undergone testing. Test uptake was associated with personal medical history, greater familiarity with genetic testing, and self-reported physical health (all p<0.05). A minority of employed adults surveyed reported being offered, or having had, wGT. Nevertheless, many employees are potentially interested in wGT, particularly for common diseases. Although employees have wGT concerns, many view it as beneficial to inform health behaviors and decisions.

Indexed as

EmployeesEthical, legal, and social implications (ELSI)InterestTesting uptakeWorkplace genetic testing (wGT)Workplace wellness programs

Identifiers

PMID41862740
PMCPMC13004782

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.