ArticleInternational journal of obesity (2005)2026
A sequential deep learning model for predicting people with obesity in adults aged 18-64 using physical fitness variables.
Article in International journal of obesity (2005), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
objectivesHealth of people with obesity is a global concern. We developed an explainable sequential deep learning model using nationally representative physical fitness data to predict people with obesity and to identify the most influential predictors. SUBJECTS/
methodsWe analyzed data from 204,334 adults collected between 2010 and 2023. A sequential neural network model was trained and evaluated using stratified 5-fold cross-validation. Model performance was assessed using accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score, and ROC-AUC, as well as MAE, MSE, and R². Explainability was examined using SHAP and LIME analyses to rank feature importance and interpret decision patterns.
resultsAcross five stratified folds, the model achieved an overall accuracy of 0.87-0.88 (p < 0.001 vs. random). Fold 4 showed optimal performance (TN = 1,462; FN = 184; FP = 249; TP = 1,554), yielding an accuracy of 0.873 (precision = 0.866, recall = 0.855, F1 = 0.876, ROC-AUC = 0.95) and stabilizing at 20 epochs. For this model, MAE was 0.122, MSE was 0.041, and R² was 0.833, with an average prediction error of 0.171 for the first 50 samples. SHAP identified 20-m shuttle run estimated VO₂max (importance = 0.339), gender (0.2481), and relative grip strength (0.135) as the top predictors. LIME (intercept = 0.511, predicted=0.668, R² = 0.995) indicated that low estimated VO₂max ( < 28.71 ml/kg/min) and low relative grip strength ( < 38.17%) substantially increased the probability of obesity classification, particularly among females.
conclusionsThis explainable sequential deep learning model accurately predicts people with obesity using physical fitness variables and highlights the critical role of cardiorespiratory fitness in obesity risk assessment and management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41862701What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.