ArticleNPJ digital medicine2026
High-sensitivity pan-cancer AI assessment of lymph node metastasis via uncertainty quantification.
Article in NPJ digital medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
30 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The histological heterogeneity of primary tumors across the pan-cancer spectrum poses a formidable barrier to accurate lymph node metastasis assessment, often causing AI systems to make "overconfident errors" on rare variants that lead to missed diagnoses. To address this, we present UPATHLN, a unified diagnostic platform that synergizes a pathology foundation model-based encoder with a decoupled uncertainty estimation mechanism. We developed and validated the system using a large-scale multicentre dataset of 26,229 lymph nodes from 14 distinct primary origins. In internal validation, UPATHLN achieved an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.986. Crucially, the uncertainty module functioned as a decisive fail-safe: by flagging potential false-negative predictions for mandatory pathologist review, it intercepted all missed diagnoses, securing 100% conditional sensitivity across both the development and independent test cohorts-even for tumors from seven unseen primary origins. Concurrently, this mechanism reduced the review burden on negative lymph nodes by 73.2%. Ultimately, UPATHLN sets a new benchmark for safety-critical AI, demonstrating that explicitly modeling uncertainty is key to unlocking reliable, workload-efficient diagnostics at the pan-cancer scale.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.