ArticleScientific reports2026
Finite element analysis of sacral fixation strategies for fragility fractures of the pelvis.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Biomechanical and clinical analysis of pelvic stability and the role of internal fixation after debridement for sacroiliac joint tuberculosis with different degrees of bone destruction.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study aimed to evaluate the biomechanical performance of different sacroiliac screw fixation strategies for posterior pelvic ring injuries in older adults with fragility fractures of the pelvis. A finite element model was created using the pelvis of an older woman with combined anterior and posterior ring injuries, simulating a unilateral pubic rami fracture and a Denis zone I sacral fracture. A subcutaneous internal fixator (INFIX) system was used to support the anterior pelvic ring. Percutaneous sacroiliac screws of different lengths and fixation levels were used to create six posterior fixation configurations. The peak von Mises stress within the INFIX system remained below 4 MPa across all configurations, whereas the maximum displacement at the pubic fracture site was < 0.04 mm. Among posterior constructs, the dual-segment long screw configuration showed the lowest sacral fracture displacement (0.02 mm) and the highest screw stress (28.66 MPa). Compared with single-level fixation, constructs with both S1 and S2 fixation demonstrated less fracture displacement and superior load distribution patterns. Furthermore, compared with short screws, long screws exhibited distinct load-sharing features, suggesting improved stress transfer through the posterior pelvic ring. In conclusion, dual-segment sacroiliac screw fixation—particularly using long trans-iliac–trans-sacral screws spanning both S1 and S2 levels—provided improved fracture stability and more advantageous load-sharing behavior in this simulation setting, both in the osteoporotic finite element model and under static, symmetric loading conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.