ArticleScientific reports2026
Exploration of the usage of dental composite resin and the perception of its potential implications in forensic odontology among Lebanese dentists.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Composite resins are widely used restorative dental materials due to their aesthetic and mechanical properties. Their diversity in brands, filler types and shades may contribute to distinctive restorative characteristics, providing supportive comparative data when combined with comprehensive ante-mortem records for forensic identification; however, they are often under-documented in patients’ dental records. This study surveyed 79 Lebanese dentists to explore the use of composite resins and their perception of its importance in forensic odontology. Results show a preferable choice for the brand of 3M Filtek (60.1%) among the Lebanese dentists. The preferred composite resin types are both micro and nanohybrid (58.2%). Regarding shade selection, 71 dentists adapt A2 shade in their clinic. While 44.6% of the respondents recognized composite resin as a tool for victim identification, only approximately 21–25% of them documented the material-specific details, highlighting gap in forensic-relevant record-keeping. Prior legal training is shown to have significantly influenced the perceived level on the importance of composite resins in forensic odontology (p = 0.024) and the need for further research (p = 0.012). To conclude, this study highlights the potential forensic values of composite resins and emphasizes the need to integrate legal and forensic education for the enhancement of forensically relevant documentation and research during dental practice, underscoring a universal need for precise record-keeping that transcends national boundaries.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.