ArticleScientific reports2026
Statistical models to characterize colon tumor stiffness heterogeneity through representative atomic force microscopy maps.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The study of the impact of physical forces and on cells has emerged as a fertile field of investigation. Applications in oncology are especially transformative since tumor stiffness was found associated with fundamental processes such as tumorigenicity, disease progression, and resistance to therapy. We present an integrated atomic force microscopy-statistical modeling and machine learning approach in colon cancer to link clinical and phenotypical parameters with local maps of tissue stiffness. Statistical modeling found both known associations, such as with age or tumor stage, but also novel associations, such as with RAS mutations, tumor left-/right-colon localization, and DNA repair deficiencies (microsatellite instabilities). Machine learning was able to infer clinical parameters from stiffness data. This work establishes a computational framework to build global models integrating all the available clinical parameters and assess their relevance with respect to stiffness, while they are usually explored separately. Similarly, we established spatial statistics techniques to interpolate and model the topographical information embedded in local stiffness maps.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.