ArticleScientific reports2026
Techno-economic assessment of retrofit pathways towards near zero-energy performance in a Saudi residential villa.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Residential buildings in hot-arid regions experience high cooling loads and rapidly increasing electricity demand, making cost-effective retrofits a strategic priority. This study evaluates techno-economic retrofit pathways that can move existing single-family homes in Saudi Arabia toward Near Zero-Energy Building (NZEB) performance. A detailed energy model of a representative detached villa in Riyadh was developed in DesignBuilder and calibrated against measured 2023 electricity bills (60,048 kWh/year), demonstrating close agreement between simulated and observed consumption in accordance with ASHRAE Guideline 14. The calibrated model was used to assess both individual and bundled retrofit measures, including external wall insulation, high-performance double glazing, extended horizontal shading devices, and a rooftop photovoltaic (PV) system sized to the available roof area. Results show that envelope retrofit packages combining insulation, glazing, and external shading can reduce annual electricity consumption by 34–37% (20,668–22,447 kWh) relative to the calibrated baseline, although shading alone exhibited weak standalone economic performance. Pareto-optimized scenarios highlight clear trade-offs between minimum energy use and economic performance: insulation-intensive packages achieve the lowest site energy consumption (37,601–38,473 kWh/year) but result in longer payback periods (72.4–108.9 months), whereas lower-cost configurations without insulation yield shorter payback periods (31.1 months) with slightly higher residual energy use. Integrating a 20.5 kWp rooftop photovoltaic system further reduces net grid electricity demand to 9,489–11,268 kWh/year, approaching near zero-energy performance; however, overall payback periods increased to 70–116 months due to the additional upfront investment required for PV systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.