Observational studyScientific reports2026
Construct validity of real-world digital mobility outcomes in patients after proximal femoral fracture: a cross-sectional observational study.
Observational study in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Trial
- Real-world walking and activity patterns in community-dwelling older adults: a cross-sectional analysis of baseline data from the SMART-AGE trial.European review of aging and physical activity : official journal of the European Group for Research into Elderly and Physical Activity · 2026Article
- Digital home-based physical activity promotion for older adults after total hip arthroplasty: protocol for the randomized controlled iPATH trial.BMC geriatrics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
22 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Digital mobility outcomes (DMOs) offer unique insights into recovery of real-world mobility after proximal femoral fracture (PFF), but their clinical validity remains to be established. This study assessed construct validity (convergent, divergent, and known-groups) of 24 DMOs measuring walking activity (amount, pattern) and gait (pace, rhythm, bout-to-bout variability) in patients within one year after PFF. Patients were recruited from inpatient and outpatient lists at five European sites, resulting in 505 included participants (66% female), with mean age of 77.6 ± 9.4 years and supervised gait speed of 0.7 ± 0.4 m/s. Mobility was monitored over seven days using a single wearable device on the lower back. Convergent and divergent validity analyses were stratified by two groups: acute (≤ 14 days since surgery) and non-acute (≥ 15 days since surgery). Correlations between DMOs and related (clinical- and patient-reported mobility outcomes) and unrelated constructs (hearing impairment and systolic blood pressure) were compared to a priori expected correlations. Known-groups validity was assessed across four recovery phases. The results were evaluated individually by experts and in a subsequent consensus meeting, with 17 of 24 DMOs showing evidence of construct validity in non-acute PFF patients. These findings represent an initial step in a larger process towards regulatory endorsement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.