ArticleScientific reports2026
Silica based ZnFe
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Growing environmental problems and the threat of an energy crisis have created an urgent need for affordable and efficient photocatalysts that can work under UV light to remove pollutants. In this work, Zinc ferrite (ZnFe2O4) nanoparticles were prepared by a chemical co-precipitation method, while SiO2 nanoparticles were produced through dry mechanical milling. These materials were then combined in a 1:1 molar ratio using the same dry mechanical method to form a doped ZnFe2O4/SiO2 nanocomposite. The structure and composition of the composite were analyzed using high-resolution transmission electron microscopy, scanning electron microscopy, and energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy. The photocatalytic and adsorption performance of the ZnFe2O4/SiO2 nanocomposite was tested under different conditions, including pH, initial dye concentration, and amount of nanocomposite used. The results showed that 0.01 g of the composite removed 95% of basic fuchsin dye at pH 11 after 150 min. The kinetic analysis revealed that the degradation process followed a pseudo-first-order model. Overall, the ZnFe2O4/SiO2 nanocomposite showed excellent potential as an effective and practical material for environmental cleanup and industrial wastewater treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.