ArticleScientific reports2026
Threat and blame frames in political rhetoric about societal issues lead to neural and political polarization.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Online content about societal issues like climate change and immigration are often presented via frames of threat and blame. Here, we investigated how exposure to such framing in the context of an online short video-clip impacts voting behavior and associated brain activity. In a large-scale online study of 1825 Dutch participants, we found that online threat and blame framed video-clips increased agreement with the clips themselves but decreased issue voting, that is, voting in line with the intensity of one’s political beliefs. A follow-up fMRI study with 27 participants replicated this behavioral finding. It also showed that video-clips with threat- or blame-frames, compared to neutral video-clips, were represented more dissimilarly across participants in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC)—a region involved in narrative understanding. These findings suggest that subtle framing of online political content can influence voter decisions and even the fundamental act of communication itself within a society.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.