Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41862572›Full record

ArticleCommunications biology2026

Linguistic structure and language familiarity sharpen phoneme encoding in the brain.

Filiz Tezcan, Sanne Ten Oever, Fan Bai, Noémie Te Rietmolen, Andrea E Martin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Communications biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Filiz TezcanLanguage and Computation in Neural Systems Group, Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. tezcanfiliz@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3327-0181
Sanne Ten OeverLanguage and Computation in Neural Systems Group, Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7547-5842
Fan BaiLanguage and Computation in Neural Systems Group, Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9385-2525
Noémie Te RietmolenLanguage and Computation in Neural Systems Group, Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Andrea E MartinLanguage and Computation in Neural Systems Group, Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3395-7234

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

How does the brain turn a physical signal like speech into meaning? It draws on two key sources: linguistic structure (e.g., phonemes, syntax) and statistical regularities from experience. Yet how these jointly shape neural representations of language remains unclear. We used MEG to track phonemic and acoustic encoding during spoken language comprehension in native Dutch, Mandarin-Chinese, and Turkish speakers. Phoneme-level encoding is stronger during sentence comprehension than in word lists, and more robust within words than random syllables. Surprisingly, similar encoding emerges even in an uncomprehended language but only with prior exposure. In contrast, acoustic edges are briefly suppressed early in comprehension. This suggests that the brain's alignment to speech (in phase and power) is robustly tuned by structure and by learned statistical patterns. Our findings show how structured knowledge and experience-based learning interact to shape neural responses to language, offering insight into how the brain processes complex, meaningful signals.

Indexed as

BrainLanguageLinguisticsPhoneticsRecognition, PsychologySpeech PerceptionComprehensionFemaleHumansMagnetoencephalographyMale

Identifiers

PMID41862572
PMCPMC13168568

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.