Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41862544›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Modelling the cleanup of the North Pacific Garbage Patch based on 3 years of operational experience.

Bruno Sainte-Rose, Laurent Lebreton, Yannick Pham, Arjen Tjallema, Christophe Maes

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Bruno Sainte-RoseThe Ocean Cleanup, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. bruno.sainte-rose@theoceancleanup.com.
Laurent LebretonThe Ocean Cleanup, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Yannick PhamThe Ocean Cleanup, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Arjen TjallemaThe Ocean Cleanup, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Christophe MaesUniversité de Bretagne Occidentale, IRD, Brest, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ending plastic pollution in the marine environment requires reducing the sources, preventing the plastics from entering the ocean, and removing the persistent legacy pollution accumulated in areas such as the North Pacific Garbage Patch (NPGP). This study assesses the feasibility and costs of collecting plastics accumulated in the NPGP during a 10 year-period, starting in 2027. The cleanup method consists of a fleet of U-shaped net systems towed behind two vessels funneling the plastic towards a retention zone which is periodically emptied. The background plastic mass concentration at the surface is based on a dispersal model calibrated on the results of field operations, and specifically on measurements performed during 72 collection periods which, between August 2021 and November 2024, led to the removal of a cumulated mass of 372,733 kg of plastics. The study evaluates the impact of the number of cleanup systems, the growth of the mass of plastics in the NPGP, the system’s retention efficiency, and how the systems are steered through the NPGP. Cost estimates are derived from vessel types, market rates, and past operational expenses. Results indicate that, after a decade, more than 80% of the total mass of plastics (> 1.5 cm) of the NPGP baseline can be eliminated, with up to 180 kt of plastics removed from an area covering an average of 1.6 M km2. This target could be reached at a cost of €1.8 billion in an optimal scenario, representing a negligible fraction (< 1%) of the value of the ecosystem services threatened by plastic pollution in this oceanic region for the next century.

Identifiers

PMID41862544
PMCPMC13004986

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.