ArticleScientific reports2026
Vaccine-derived T-cell responses are insufficient to generate protective immunity to SARS-CoV-2.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Neutralizing antibodies are established correlates of protection against SARS-CoV-2, yet T-cell responses are also thought to contribute substantially to limiting disease severity and enhancing durability of protection. To examine whether cellular immunity alone can confer protection, we engineered DNA vaccines encoding modified Spike proteins, including C-terminal truncation (SARS-CoV-2-ΔC, ΔC) and cleavage-site–deleted, linker-inserted (SARS-CoV-2-Linker-ΔT, Linker-ΔT) variants, with or without genetic fusion to MIP3α, which has been shown to enhance targeting of antigen-presenting cells (APC) and preferentially induce T-cell responses. In BALB/c mice, ΔC constructs induced non-neutralizing Spike- and RBD-binding antibodies across variants, as well as robust CD4 + and CD8 + T cell responses, whereas Linker-ΔT elicited strong Th1-skewed cellular immunity in the absence of humoral responses. In K18-hACE2 mice antibody neutralizing activity was not detected by any of the vaccines, and none conferred protection following lethal virus challenge, despite robust specific T-cell cytokine responses. These findings support chemokine-fusion strategies to enhance T cell priming, while indicating that the cellular immunity elicited by this vaccine alone does not confer protection against SARS-CoV-2. Integrating such APC-targeting strategies with structural modifications that preserve pre-fusion neutralizing epitopes may be worthwhile.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.