ArticleScientific reports2026
Feature reduction using swarm optimization and random forest classifiers for early diabetes risk prediction.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Diabetes is a chronic metabolic disorder caused by excessive blood sugar levels, which leads to severe damage to other organs. Type 2 diabetes is, more often than others, a long-term metabolic disorder in which the body resists insulin or does not produce enough of it. Early diabetes detection with fewer features reduces patient burden, and machine learning makes the process more time-efficient. This study proposes three machine learning approaches that achieve both high performance and effective feature reduction using the Early Stage Diabetes Risk Prediction dataset. Multiple research works have been published. However, they have struggled to achieve efficient feature reduction while maintaining high accuracy and have not provided detailed explanations of the models' nature or misclassifications. This research resolves the issues by showing outstanding performance, including a remarkable feature reduction. Three different swarm-based metaheuristic algorithms: Fox Optimizer, Honey Badger Algorithm, and Tuna Swarm Optimization, have been used, wrapped with a Random Forest Classifier. SHAP, as an explainable AI, is used to present the model's nature and feature importance, including individual predictions. FOX_RF, HBA_RF, and TSO_RF have gained an Accuracy of 99.36%, 99.36%, and 100% without cross-validation. However, TSO_RF has achieved the highest mean 10-fold cross-validation accuracy of 98.14%, F-score of 98.47%, and 98.54% of Precision using only 14 features out of 16. And, FOX_RF has achieved the highest mean Precision of 98,43%. HBA_RF has shown the highest number of feature reduction by selecting 10 features out of 16, maintaining a moderate performance. SHAP has confirmed that Polyuria, Polydipsia, and Gender are the most impacted features for diabetes prediction. SHAP-based individual prediction analysis has revealed that even small changes in these features can influence the model's decisions. This research analyzes the Early Stage Diabetes Risk Prediction dataset, which includes 520 individuals with 16 predictors and one target class, where TSO_RF has outperformed other models by achieving 100% and 98.14% of Accuracy, respectively, without cross-validation and using cross-validation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.