ArticleScientific reports2026
Research on the atomic clock signal denoising method based on the hyperbolic tangent smooth threshold function.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
To address the discontinuity and constant bias inherent in traditional hard and soft threshold functions, an atomicclock signal denoising method based on the hyperbolic tangent smooth threshold function was proposed. The atomicclock signal was decomposed into a series of intrinsic mode functions (IMFs) and a residual component usingempirical mode decomposition (EMD). A novel threshold function was constructed to achieve a continuous transitionbetween hard and soft threshold behaviors by introducing a smoothing factor. The optimal threshold for each IMFwas determined using Stein’s Unbiased Risk Estimate (SURE) criterion, and each IMF component was denoisedaccordingly. Finally, the denoised IMFs and the residual component were reconstructed to obtain the fi nal denoisedsignal. Case study analyses demonstrated that, in comparison with traditional wavelet threshold denoising methods,the proposed method suppressed noise eff ectively while preserving the smoothness and detailed features of thesignal more favorably. Specifi cally, in terms of noise suppression, the improved thresholding method increased theSNR by 14%, 5% and 26% for cesium clock, hydrogen clock and measured rubidium clock data. In terms of signalfi delity, its RMSE was reduced by 28%, 10% and 25% relative to the soft thresholding method. This method retainedthe authentic information of the signal while suppressing noise, and exhibited good repeatability. It eff ectivelyimproved the frequency stability of the time scale, thereby providing a novel technical approach for enhancing thequality of atomic clock data and the frequency stability of the time scale.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.