ArticleScientific reports2026
Study on warpage stress in SiP packages during reflow soldering.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
With the ongoing trend toward miniaturization and high-density integration in electronic packaging, System-in-Package (SiP) has become a key research focus for large-scale AI model integration. This study investigates SiP packaging, focusing on warpage-induced stress during reflow soldering through detailed simulations. Unlike previous FEM approaches, this study integrates both viscoelastic dielectric modeling and trace mapping for realistic SiP reflow simulation, including actual copper trace layouts, viscoelasticity, and creep behavior, to develop an effective simulation model. Warpage and stress under complex conditions—such as varying dielectric layers, core substrate materials, and solder ball compositions—are thoroughly examined. The results indicate that simulations considering trace layouts and initial warpage offer significantly more accurate predictions than traditional models. For core substrate materials, the elastic modulus alone is not the dominant factor; rather, performance is governed by the interaction between the coefficient of thermal expansion (CTE) and interlayer compatibility. ABF-L engineering materials demonstrate minimal warpage when used as substrate dielectrics. Among solder materials, Sn63Pb37 exhibits the lowest equivalent stress at 29.007 MPa under identical conditions but accumulates the highest plastic strain at 6.3659 × 10−2, making it susceptible to plastic deformation. This compromises fatigue life and reliability, increasing the long-term risk of substrate warpage.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.