ArticleScientific data2026
VitalDB Arrhythmia Database: An Anesthesiologist-Validated Large-scale Intraoperative Arrhythmia Dataset with Beat and Rhythm Labels.
Article in Scientific data, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Intraoperative cardiac arrhythmias present distinct characteristics compared to non-surgical environments, yet publicly available electrocardiogram (ECG) databases have primarily focused on ambulatory or intensive care environments. To address this gap, we present the VitalDB Arrhythmia Database, a comprehensive collection of intraoperative ECG recordings with beat and rhythm labels specifically designed for developing and validating arrhythmia detection algorithms in surgical patients. The database comprises 734,528 seconds of continuous ECG data from 482 surgical patients, with a median annotated recording duration of 20 minutes. It contains over 660,000 annotated heartbeats across four beat types and 10 distinct rhythm categories. To efficiently process the extensive source data, we developed a custom deep learning beat classifier that serves as an automated screening tool for arrhythmia candidate segments. All annotations underwent rigorous validation by five anesthesiologists, with each segment independently reviewed by at least two anesthesiologists, and 9.3% required full committee consensus. Inter-rater reliability analysis demonstrated excellent agreement with an overall Cohen's kappa of 0.930 ± 0.130. This publicly accessible resource provides the research community with clinically validated intraoperative arrhythmia data, facilitating the development of robust arrhythmia detection algorithms and enabling multimodal analysis to investigate the hemodynamic impact of intraoperative arrhythmias.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.