Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41862182›Full record

Trial reportThe British journal of ophthalmology2026

Effect of low-dose atropine on young premyopic and low-myopic children: atropine treatment of myopia (ATOM3) - a randomised control trial.

Audrey Chia, Sarah Burkill, Yvonne Ling, Boon Long Quah, Deborah Tan, Su Ann Tay, Amelia Tay, Seang-Mei Saw, Donald Tiang-Hwee Tan

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The British journal of ophthalmology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Identifying and Managing Pre-Myopia: A Narrative Review.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2026
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Audrey ChiaSingapore National Eye Centre, Singapore wla_chia@yahoo.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8166-4575
Sarah BurkillSingapore Clinical Research Institute, Singapore.
Yvonne LingSingapore National Eye Centre, Singapore.
Boon Long QuahSingapore National Eye Centre, Singapore.
Deborah TanSingapore National Eye Centre, Singapore.
Su Ann TaySingapore National Eye Centre, Singapore.
Amelia TaySingapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore.
Seang-Mei SawSingapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7166-796X
Donald Tiang-Hwee TanSingapore National Eye Centre, Singapore.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo evaluate the effectiveness of atropine 0.01% in young premyopic and low-myopic children.

methodsChildren (5-9 years old) with premyopia (spherical equivalent refraction, SER+1.00 to -0.49D, n 156) or low myopia (SER -0.50 to -1.50D, n 52), with at least 1 parent with myopia <-3.00D, were randomised to receive placebo or atropine 0.01% eye-drops in a 1:1 ratio. Cycloplegic autorefraction and axial length were measured every 6 months over 2 years.

resultsMean baseline SER was +0.5+/-0.04D in premyopia and -1.00±0.06D in the low-myopia eyes. Progression over 2 years in premyopic eyes was -0.96±0.10D vs -0.82±0.10D (p=0.328), or 0.72±0.03 mm vs 0.63±0.04 mm (p=0.161) in the placebo and atropine groups, respectively. Progression in eyes remaining emmetropic was -0.43±0.37D vs -0.29±0.37D (p=0.007) or 0.49±0.22 mm vs 0.41±0.38 mm (p=0.209) in the placebo versus atropine-treated eyes, respectively; while eyes which became myopic progressed by -1.78±0.82D vs -1.63±0.82D (p=0.121) or 1.08±0.34 mm vs 0.96±0.14 mm (p=0.010). Incident myopia at 2 years was 42.6% in placebo and 44.8% in atropine 0.01% treated eyes (p=0.896). In the low-myopia group, placebo versus atropine treated eyes progressed by -1.65±0.15D vs -1.23±0.15D (p=0.066) or 0.86±0.07 mm vs 0.68±0.05 mm (p=0.062) at 2 years. There was no difference in near acuity, glare (2.7%) or allergy (6.0%) between treatment groups.

conclusionsAlthough there were no significant differences in myopia progression between atropine and placebo treated eyes, there were trends towards less myopic shift in atropine-treated eyes in premyopic eyes which remained emmetropic and in eyes with low myopia.

Indexed as

AtropineMydriaticsMyopiaAxial Length, EyeChildChild, PreschoolDisease ProgressionDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansMaleOphthalmic SolutionsRefraction, OcularTreatment OutcomeAtropineMydriaticsOphthalmic SolutionsClinical TrialTreatment Medical

Identifiers

PMID41862182
PMCPMC13018830

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.