Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41862018›Full record

ArticleThe American journal of pathology2026

Machine Learning Predicts Adequacy of Rapid On-site Evaluation in Fine Needle Aspirations in Lung Cancer Cytology.

Christian Brechenmacher, Brie Kezlarian, Gregor Weirich, Stephany Botelho, Buraphol Wangsaroj, Darren Buonocore, Peter J Schüffler

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The American journal of pathology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Christian BrechenmacherInstitute of Pathology, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany; Institute of AI for Health, Helmholtz Munich, Neuherberg, Germany. Electronic address: c.brechenmacher@tum.de.
Brie KezlarianMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Gregor WeirichInstitute of Pathology, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Stephany BotelhoMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Buraphol WangsarojMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Darren BuonocoreMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Peter J SchüfflerInstitute of Pathology, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Hongbiao Carl Lekaye · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lung cancer is projected to become the leading cause of cancer-related mortality in both smoking and nonsmoking populations. Rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE) of fine needle aspiration specimens is essential for timely diagnosis and procedural decision-making during lung cancer assessment. A machine learning pipeline was developed for cell-based adequacy assessment and lesion detection that integrates automated cell detection, convolutional neural network-based cell classification, and slide-level aggregation using a random forest model. On held-out test data, binary classifiers for lymphocytes and tumor cells achieved accuracies of 91.5% and 92.7% with recalls of 92.6% and 93.1%, respectively. The end-to-end ROSE system demonstrated class accuracies of 82% to 85%, comparable with human cytologist performance, and a lesion-focused classifier reached a recall of 92.0%. These findings indicate that machine learning-based cell analysis can support ROSE by expediting adequacy assessment and improving diagnostic yield during transbronchial needle aspiration procedures.

Indexed as

Lung NeoplasmsMachine LearningRapid On-site EvaluationBiopsy, Fine-NeedleClassification AlgorithmsConvolutional Neural NetworksHumansPredictive Learning ModelsRandom Forest

Identifiers

PMID41862018
PMCPMC13269337

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.