ArticleJHEP reports : innovation in hepatology2026
Liver transplantation in unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma following neoadjuvant chemotherapy and SIRT.
Article in JHEP reports : innovation in hepatology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND &
aimsUnresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) has a poor prognosis, with limited curative options. Chemotherapy combined with selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT) has shown promising results in tumor response and survival. We evaluated liver transplantation (LT) outcomes following this neoadjuvant approach in patients with liver-limited iCCA in our center.
methodWe retrospectively included all patients who underwent LT in the Rennes University Hospital for unresectable, locally advanced iCCA following neoadjuvant treatment with a combination of chemotherapy and SIRT.
resultsSix patients underwent transplantation between 2010 and 2024. The median timeframe from diagnosis to listing was 351 days (IQR 250-558 days). The median time from listing to LT was 114 days (44-192 days). Age was 50.7 years (39.9-59.3 years) with a sex ratio of 1:1. The initial total tumor size was 100 mm (65-115 mm), with one tumoral lesion (1-1). Neoadjuvant treatment consisted of a gemcitabine-cisplatin regimen in four of six patients (66.7%), while one patient received cisplatin combined with 5-fluorouracil. The median follow-up was 4.9 years (1.8-8.8 years). The median length of hospitalization following LT was 12 days (10-20 days). Five-year overall survival was 100%, while 5-year progression-free survival was 44.4% (95% CI 8.9-88.0%) with three patients who experienced iCCA recurrence on Days 573, 577, and 1,180 after LT. No patient has yet died from tumor progression.
conclusionsThis study presents one of the first series of unresectable iCCA cases treated with a neoadjuvant combination of SIRT and chemotherapy. Very selected patients (six patients over 15 years) who underwent LT demonstrated high long-term survival rates and an acceptable recurrence rate, even in the presence of large tumor sizes. Prospective trials evaluating this neoadjuvant combination are awaited. IMPACT AND IMPLICATIONS: Liver transplantation is not currently considered a standard therapeutic option for patients with unresectable, liver-limited intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma because of historically poor outcomes. This study provides a scientific rationale for reconsidering transplantation in a highly selected subgroup of patients who achieve sustained disease control after neoadjuvant chemotherapy combined with selective internal radiation therapy. The results are particularly relevant for transplant hepatologists, oncologists, and surgeons, as they suggest that treatment response and prolonged disease stability may better predict post-transplant outcomes than tumor size alone. Clinically, these findings support a multidisciplinary, response-based selection strategy with a 'test-of-time' approach, while acknowledging the small sample size and retrospective design, and highlight the need for prospective studies and structured allocation frameworks to safely expand this approach.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.