ArticleJournal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance
Myocardial T2 mapping using wideband T2 preparation gradient echo readout for patients with implantable cardiac devices at 1.5T.
Article in Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMyocardial T2 mapping enables non-invasive assessment of inflammation and edema. However, in patients with implantable cardiac devices, such as pacemakers or defibrillators (ICDs), off-resonance effects often cause severe image artifacts and inaccurate T2 values. PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to develop and evaluate a wideband T2-prepared gradient-echo (GRE) myocardial T2 mapping sequence combined with an advanced patch-based denoising approach, designed to reduce artifacts and improve image quality in device-implanted patients at 1.5T.
methodsA T2 preparation with wideband adiabatic refocusing pulses (5.0 kHz bandwidth) was integrated into a breath-held 2D GRE T2 mapping sequence (TE = 0/27/55ms). Patch-based denoising was applied after image reconstruction. The sequence was tested in a phantom, 8 healthy volunteers with and without ICDs placed on their chests, 13 patients without devices, 7 patients with ICDs or pacemakers, and 1 sheep scanned before and after induced myocardial infarction with and without external ICD. The proposed sequence was compared against reference conventional GRE and balanced steady-state free-precession (bSSFP) T2 mapping. Patch-based denoising was optimized in patients without devices and impact on T2 precision and accuracy was assessed. Phantom studies included Bland-Altman and correlation analyses between the sequences. In-vivo performance was assessed through global and segmental T2 quantification, coefficient of variation (COV), artifact scoring, and edema detection. ANOVA with Bonferroni correction and pairwise testing were used for statistical comparisons.
resultsIn subjects without devices, wideband and conventional GRE T2 mapping yielded comparable T2 values (P = 0.60). With ICDs, conventional GRE T2 mapping underestimated global T2 by 16% (P<0.001) and increased segmental COV up to 30%. In contrast, wideband GRE T2 mapping provided accurate T2 values (P = 0.56) and preserved edema detection, showing relative T2 elevations of 44% comparable to bSSFP. Patch-based denoising significantly improved precision (P = 0.006) without biasing mean values (P = 0.999). Results were consistent across phantom, volunteer, patient, and animal experiments, including animal ex-vivo histology confirmation.
conclusionWideband GRE T2 mapping substantially reduced device-related artifacts, provided accurate T2 values, and allowed edema detection, offering a clinically feasible solution for patients with cardiac implants in this initial study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.