ArticleSocial science & medicine (1982)2026
Neighborhood opportunity and cellular senescence in a national sample of U.S. adults.
Article in Social science & medicine (1982), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Differential expression of lymphocyte markers by neighborhood opportunity among US adults: Insights from the Midlife in the United States study.Psychoneuroendocrinology · 2026Article
- Neighborhood Opportunity and Fatal Police Pursuits in the US.JAMA network open · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
While prior research has documented associations between neighborhood conditions and physiological markers of aging, the relationship between neighborhood conditions and cellular aging remains underexplored. We quantified the association between neighborhood opportunity and expression of cellular senescence markers among 1,215 biomarker participants in the Midlife in the United States study. Neighborhood opportunity was assessed using the Childhood Opportunity Index 3.0 (Overall, Education, Health and Environment, Social and Economic Resources). Four transcriptomic markers of cellular senescence were examined from peripheral blood mononuclear cells: CDKN2A RNA abundance, DNA Damage Response (DDR30) composite score, and two Senescence-Associated Secretory Phenotype (SASP10, SASP57) composite scores. After covariate adjustment, individuals living in low-opportunity neighborhoods had significantly elevated CDKN2A RNA abundance (β = 0.32, 95% CI: 0.04, 0.59, p = 0.024) compared to those in high-opportunity neighborhoods. Secondary analysis suggested that this association was potentially driven by low Social and Economic Resources (β = 0.35, 95% CI: 0.07, 0.63, p = 0.013), rather than by Education or Health and Environment domains. No statistically significant relationships were observed for neighborhood opportunity with DDR30, SASP10, and SASP57. These findings provide molecular evidence that low neighborhood opportunity may be biologically embedded at the cellular level. The specificity of associations to social and economic resources and to upstream senescence regulation suggests that neighborhood associations with aging may operate through distinct biological pathways. Future longitudinal studies are needed to establish temporality and explore potential mechanisms linking neighborhood conditions to senescence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.