ArticleGenetics and molecular biology2026
Characterization of CRISPR-Cas systems in the Haemophilus genus CRISPR-Cas in Haemophilus spp.
Article in Genetics and molecular biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats (CRISPR) and CRISPR-associated (Cas) system constitutes a crucial adaptive defense mechanism in prokaryotes against foreign genetic elements. Although CRISPR-Cas systems have been characterized in numerous bacteria, the architecture and function of these systems in the Haemophilus genus remain poorly understood. This study aims to analyze CRISPR-Cas systems in 138Haemophilusstrains and investigate their function, particularly in relation to virulence factors. Results revealed that CRISPR-Cas systems were identified in 31.88% of the Haemophilusstrains. Subtype I-C was the most prevalent, followed by subtypes II-C and III-A. Repeat sequences and thecas1gene were highly conserved within the same subtype. 29.62% of spacer sequences exhibited homology to plasmids or bacteriophages. phiMHaA1 was an important target of the CRISPR-Cas system in Haemophilusgenus. The protospacer adjacent motif sequences (PAM) were determined to be 5'-TTC-3' for subtype I-C and 5'-TTT-3' for subtype II-C. Comparative analysis of virulence genes showed that CRISPR-positive strains carried more ompP2 than CRISPR-negative strains, while the distribution of hmw2C and hmw1C exhibited an opposite trend. These findings provide novel insights into the diversity and function of CRISPR-Cas systems inHaemophilusgenus and propose potential strategies for attenuating the impact ofHaemophilusvirulence factors.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.