ReviewCurrent opinion in ophthalmology2026
Nutritional supplements: current evidence for retinitis pigmentosa and Stargardt disease.
Review in Current opinion in ophthalmology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- [Stargardt disease: genetics, molecular mechanisms, potential lifestyle interventions and pharmacotherapy].Die Ophthalmologie · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewInherited retinal diseases (IRDs) are genetically and phenotypically heterogeneous disorders that cause progressive vision loss and lack broadly effective disease-modifying therapies. Increasing evidence implicates metabolic stress, oxidative injury, and photoreceptor-retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) dysfunction in IRD pathophysiology. This review evaluates the evidence and limitations surrounding nutritional and metabolic interventions for retinitis pigmentosa and Stargardt disease.A narrative review of preclinical studies, randomized controlled trials, and contemporary genetic re-analyses was performed. Nutritional interventions reviewed include vitamin A, vitamin E, N-acetylcysteine (NAC), omega-3 fatty acids (docosahexaenoic acid), carotenoids and apocarotenoids, and the deuterated vitamin A analog C20-D3-retinyl acetate (ALK-001). RECENT
findingsInitial studies suggesting a protective effect of vitamin A in retinitis pigmentosa were not confirmed in subsequent trials or genetic re-analyses, which identified baseline differences between groups as a possible contributor to the original findings. In contrast, supplemental vitamin E may accelerate disease progression. NAC demonstrated acceptable tolerability and modest short-term improvements in visual function in early-phase trials, with a phase 3 study ongoing. Omega-3 fatty acids, carotenoids, and apocarotenoids have not shown consistent clinically meaningful benefit in retinitis pigmentosa or Stargardt disease despite strong mechanistic rationale. In Stargardt disease, ALK-001 reduces lipofuscin accumulation in animal models and clinical trials are ongoing to assess efficacy in patients. SUMMARY: Most nutritional supplements studied to date have not demonstrated durable or clinically meaningful benefit in IRDs. Vitamin A supplementation in retinitis pigmentosa is no longer supported by current evidence, while NAC remains a promising metabolic therapy under investigation. High-quality, genotype-informed clinical trials with clinically relevant endpoints are needed before nutritional interventions can be incorporated into IRD management guidelines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.