Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41861349›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in urology2026

The future of urothelial carcinoma: a 2024-2025 update of early-phase trials of novel therapeutic agents.

Yan Hiu Athena Lee, Chris Ming-Ho Wong, Alex Qinyang Liu, Jeremy Yuen-Chun Teoh

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in urology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Yan Hiu Athena LeeS.H. Ho Urology Centre, Department of Surgery, Prince of Wales Hospital.
Chris Ming-Ho WongS.H. Ho Urology Centre, Department of Surgery, Prince of Wales Hospital.
Alex Qinyang LiuS.H. Ho Urology Centre, Department of Surgery, Prince of Wales Hospital.
Jeremy Yuen-Chun TeohS.H. Ho Urology Centre, Department of Surgery, Prince of Wales Hospital.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewThe treatment landscape for advanced and non-muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma (UC) is rapidly evolving beyond platinum chemotherapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors. This review is timely and relevant as it synthesizes recent, impactful data from 2024-2025 early-phase trials, highlighting agents poised to redefine clinical standards. RECENT

findingsRecent studies showcase promising novel strategies. These include next-generation targeted therapies like sapanisertib, novel antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) and bicycle toxin conjugates (BTCs) such as zelenectide pevedotin (BT8009) and dual-ADC combinations with high response rates, and the approved immunomodulator N-803 for BCG-unresponsive disease. Furthermore, innovative intravesical therapies, including ADCs (disitamab vedotin) and immune checkpoint inhibitors, show transformative potential for localized disease with favorable safety. SUMMARY: The findings indicate a shift towards more effective and tailored treatments. Future efforts must focus on biomarker validation, strategic sequencing, and managing combination toxicities to integrate these advances into practice and improve patient outcomes.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsCarcinoma, Transitional CellUrinary Bladder NeoplasmsClinical Trials as TopicForecastingHumansImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsImmunoconjugatesMolecular Targeted TherapyNon-Muscle Invasive Bladder NeoplasmsAntineoplastic AgentsImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsImmunoconjugatesantibody–drug conjugatesclinical trialsimmunotherapytargeted therapyurothelial carcinoma

Identifiers

PMID41861349
PMCPMC13048309

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.