Observational studyMedicine2026
Developing and validating a clinically actionable prediction tool for Parkinson disease using explainable machine learning with multidimensional national data: A cross-sectional study.
Observational study in Medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Parkinson disease (PD) is a rapidly growing neurodegenerative disorder that presents a significant public health challenge in aging societies, particularly in China. Although genetic, clinical, and environmental risk factors have been well-established, the predictive value of multidimensional factors (encompassing socioeconomic determinants, prodromal functional impairments, and lifestyle) remains underexplored in Chinese populations. We used data from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (n = 13,649; PD cases = 269) to develop and validate a machine learning prediction model for PD. Candidate predictors covered cognition, socioeconomic status, comorbidities, and lifestyle. Feature selection was performed using an ensemble approach (boruta, least absolute shrinkage and selection operator, and minimum redundancy maximum relevance), followed by extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) model development with Bayesian hyperparameter optimization. Data were randomly split into a training set (70%) and a validation set (30%) for internal validation. Model performance was evaluated using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, decision curve analysis, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and F1-score. Model interpretability was evaluated using SHapley Additive exPlanations. Key predictors included cognitive impairment (memory and executive deficits), physical inactivity (low metabolic-equivalent scores), socioeconomic indicators (retirement status and financial support), educational attainment, and comorbidities (e.g., liver disease and wrist pain). In the validation set, the optimized XGBoost model achieved an area under the curve of 0.967 (95% confidence interval 0.962-0.972), sensitivity 82.0%, specificity 94.7%, positive predictive value 81.5%, negative predictive value 94.9%, and F1-score 81.7. SHapley Additive exPlanations analyses supported the consistency and relative importance of these predictors. An explainable XGBoost model integrating multidimensional national data showed excellent internal validation performance for identifying individuals with PD in China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study. This tool may help support PD risk stratification in Chinese populations; external validation and prospective evaluation are warranted before clinical implementation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.