ArticleMedicine2026
Clinical outcomes of endovascular aortic repair in blunt traumatic aortic injury: A retrospective case series and a CARE-compliant case report.
Article in Medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
rationaleBlunt traumatic aortic injury (BTAI) is a high-mortality condition often managed by endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) due to its minimally invasive nature and favorable outcomes. PATIENT CONCERNS: Six patients with BTAI were admitted to our institution from 2014 to 2023. They presented with symptoms such as chest pain or were diagnosed with aortic injury on chest computerized tomography after motor vehicle collisions. DIAGNOSIS: All patients underwent computed tomography arteriography to confirm the diagnosis and assess the aortic injury.
interventionsAll patients received EVAR. Among these cases, 5 were classified as grade II and 1 was classified as grade IV. The patient with grade IV injury and intraoperative shock died of respiratory failure postoperatively. The remaining 5 patients had favorable outcomes. OUTCOMES: The mean follow-up was 3 years. No recurrent chest pain, spinal cord ischemia, or other aorta-related complications were observed. One patient experienced a pulmonary embolism and another had a cerebral infarction, both managed conservatively. LESSONS: EVAR is effective for BTAI, especially in reducing early mortality and complications. Careful evaluation of comorbidities and associated injuries is crucial, particularly in older patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.