ArticleMedicine2026
Association of ocular symptom burden with sleep quality and psychological distress in patients with primary glaucoma: A cross-sectional study.
Article in Medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Acute and long-term effects of ocular surface burns on ocular surface microbiota: a one-year follow-up study.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sleep problems and psychological distress are frequently reported by patients with primary glaucoma, yet the contribution of day‑to‑day ocular symptom burden has not been quantified with standard sleep and mental‑health metrics. We performed a single‑center cross‑sectional study of consecutive adults with primary glaucoma. Patients completed the study questionnaire, chart data provided visual acuity, visual field index, intraocular pressure. Ocular symptom burden (OSB) was derived from 20 bilateral ocular‑symptom items. Sleep quality was summarized by the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) constructed from S1 to S9 (global score 0-21; poor sleep PSQI > 5). Psychological distress was assessed with Kessler-10 psychological distress scale (K10) (10-50). Vision and visual‑field severities were recomputed as textbook‑concordant vision grade (1-5) and modified Glaucoma Symptom Scale grade from visual field index (1-5). Associations were tested with Spearman correlation (Benjamini-Hochberg false discovery rate), and multivariable linear/logistic regression (heteroskedasticity-consistent 3robust standard errors) adjusting for age, sex, glaucoma subtype, disease course, vision grade and visual‑field grade. We analyzed 208 patients (mean age 59.3 ± 15.0 years; 52.9% female; primary open-angle glaucoma 55.3%, primary angle-closure glaucoma 44.7%). Mean OSB severity was 34.9 ± 17.4 (0-80). PSQI global score averaged 5.81 ± 2.64; 51.9% met PSQI > 5 (108/208; 95% confidence interval (CI) 45.2%-58.6%), with sleep efficiency 90.6 ± 11.0%. K10 averaged 15.2 ± 4.9; 16.3% had mild‑to‑severe distress (≥20). OSB correlated with PSQI (OSB count r = 0.16, P = .022; OSB severity r = 0.14, P = .038) and more strongly with K10 (r = 0.23, P = .0007). The ocular‑surface/irritation symptom and pain domain correlated with PSQI (r = 0.16, P = .019), whereas visual‑function/glare domains did not (P > .20). In adjusted models, standardized OSB severity had a positive point estimate for PSOI (β = 0.31, 95% CI -0.04 to 0.66; P = .080) and was not independently associated with poor sleep (PSQI > 5; OR = 1.22, 95% CI 0.92-1.62; P = .165). Standardized OSB severity was also not independently associated with K10 total (β = 0.56, 95% CI -0.12 to 1.24; P = .109) or distress (K10 ≥ 20; OR = 1.03, 95% CI 0.72-1.48; P = .868). In this cross‑sectional study, OSB showed small bivariate correlations with sleep quality and psychological distress. However, covariate-adjusted associations were imprecise and not statistically significant. Given that approximately half of participants screened positive for poor sleep, brief screening for sleep quality and psychological distress may be considered in glaucoma care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.