Observational studyMedicine2026
Fuzzy logic for preanesthetic risk assessment in cataract surgery patients.
Observational study in Medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We aimed to build a fuzzy logic preanaesthetic risk score tailored to cataract surgery. By fusing systemic comorbidities with key patient attributes in an adaptive rule base, our goal was to generate patient-specific risk estimates that move beyond the coarse granularity of traditional categorical tools. A prospective observational cohort study was conducted at Kanuni Sultan Suleyman Hospital, University of Health Sciences, Istanbul, Turkey. Two hundred fifty-one adults who were scheduled for cataract surgery under either local or general anesthesia were included in the study. Demographic information and comorbidities were gathered prior to surgery. A fuzzy inference system incorporating 5 major (pulmonary, cardiac, renal, liver disease, and diabetes) and 3 minor (age, BMI, and smoking) criteria was developed. Risk levels were generated using 270 expert-defined fuzzy rules. Postoperative transient intraocular pressure (IOP) elevations and other complications were monitored. Among the 251 patients, 70 (27.9%) developed postoperative transient IOP elevations. Fuzzy risk scores correlated strongly with the number of major comorbidities (r = 0.954), confirming internal consistency. However, the model did not significantly differentiate between patients with and without postoperative transient intraocular pressure (IOP) elevations (AUC = 0.439; P > .05). There were no other complications found, but transient IOP elevations was significantly linked to advanced age and long-term smoking. The fuzzy logic model reliably quantified systemic risk burden but lacked predictive power for ophthalmic-specific outcomes driven by ocular factors such as transient IOP elevations. Incorporating domain-specific variables like intraocular pressure and detailed ophthalmologic assessments may improve future performance. The model remains valuable for general preanesthetic risk stratification in surgical populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.