ArticleMedicine2026
Integrating oral health into Universal Health Coverage in Europe: A cross-sectional ecological analysis of services and outcomes.
Article in Medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Integration of oral health within Universal Health Coverage (UHC) remains uneven across Europe, and comparative evidence linking statutory dental coverage and public financing with oral health outcomes is limited. This study assessed relationships between integration of essential oral health services within UHC and prevalence of untreated dental caries and self-reported unmet need for dental care across European countries. A cross-sectional ecological analysis was conducted using publicly available, country-level data for 34 WHO European Region countries (indicator years 2019-2023). Outcomes were untreated dental caries prevalence (≥5 years) and self-reported unmet dental need (≥16 years). Explanatory variables were public per capita dental expenditure (United States dollars), dentists per 10,000 population, statutory dental coverage model (comprehensive/partial = reference; limited = contrast), and public share of total dental spending (%). Descriptive statistics summarized health system indicators; 2 multiple linear regression models estimated associations. Across 34 countries, median unmet need was 1.58% (interquartile range 0.56-3.97%) and untreated caries 35.41% (interquartile range 31.61-38.15%). Health system inputs varied widely: median per capita dental expenditure = USD 97.8 (10-493.7); dentist density = 7.9 per 10,000 (1.1-17.7); public share = 32.8% (0.3-72.4). Model 1 (untreated caries): R2 = 0.371; F(4, 29) = 4.27; P = .008. Higher public per capita dental expenditure was associated with lower caries prevalence (B = -0.045; 95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.074 to -0.015; P = .004). Limited statutory coverage (vs comprehensive/partial) was associated with higher caries (B = 6.505; 95% CI: 2.526-10.483; P = .002). A higher public share of dental spending correlated positively with caries prevalence (B = 0.210; 95% CI: 0.095-0.326; P < .001). Dentist density showed no association (P = .705). Model 2 (unmet dental need): R2 = 0.370; F(4, 29) = 4.27; P = .007. Limited statutory coverage (vs comprehensive/partial) was associated with higher unmet need (B = 5.735; 95% CI: 2.396-9.075; P = .001). Other predictors were not significant (all P > .35). Broader statutory dental coverage was associated with lower unmet dental need, and greater public per capita dental expenditure with lower untreated caries prevalence. Workforce density alone was not predictive. Expanding prevention-oriented essential dental benefits and strengthening financial protection are central to achieving equitable oral health within UHC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.