ArticleMedicine2026
Partner phubbing and its association with depression and family functioning: A cross-sectional study.
Article in Medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The increasing integration of smartphones into daily life has given rise to partner phubbing - being ignored in favor of a partner phone use - which may impact mental health and family dynamics. Although phubbing has been explored in various relational contexts, empirical evidence on its association with depression and family functioning in primary care populations remains limited. This cross-sectional study was conducted among 222 married individuals aged 18 and above who visited a university-affiliated Family Health Center in Turkey between July and September 2024. Participants completed validated measures including the Phubbing Exposure Scale, Patient Health Questionnaire-2 and -9 (PHQ-2 and PHQ-9), and the Family Adaptability, Partnership, Growth, Affection, Resolve Scale. Statistical analyses included Mann-Whitney U, Kruskal-Wallis, chi-square, and correlation tests, with significance set at P < .05. Phubbing exposure was significantly higher among participants with positive PHQ-2 screenings for depressive symptoms (P < .01) and those with a history of psychiatric medication use (P < .01). Although PHQ-9 scores were not significantly associated with phubbing, early depressive symptoms measured by PHQ-2 were. Women reported higher phubbing exposure than men, and younger participants had higher perceived phubbing levels. Interestingly, individuals with low family functioning reported lower Phubbing Exposure Scale scores compared to those with moderate or high family functioning (P < .01), suggesting possible perceptual or relational dynamics in digitally neglected households. Partner phubbing appears to be linked with early depressive symptoms and various psychosocial characteristics, including gender, age, and psychiatric history. These findings highlight the relevance of digital neglect in clinical assessments and underscore the importance of integrating phubbing awareness into mental health and family care practices. Future research should explore longitudinal effects and develop interventions targeting smartphone-related disruptions in couple dynamics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.