ArticleOncology2026
Association between Antibiotic Exposure and the Risk of Checkpoint Inhibitor Pneumonitis in Lung Cancer Patients.
Article in Oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
<p>Introduction: Checkpoint inhibitor pneumonitis (CIP) is a potentially fatal immune-related adverse event in patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Antibiotics (ATBs) usage has risen among such patients, yet its relationship with CIP remains uncertain. We investigated the association between ATB exposure and CIP development in lung cancer patients treated with programmed death-1/programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-1/PD-L1) inhibitors.
methodsWe retrospectively collected clinical data of lung cancer patients who received PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors for the first time, according to predefined eligibility criteria. ATB exposure was defined as receipt of ATBs within 3 months before ICIs initiation, or within 3 months after ICI initiation but before CIP onset. Patients with ATB exposure were further stratified by timing relative to ICIs initiation and CIP onset (pre-ICIs only, post-ICIs only, or both). CIP was adjudicated by two oncologists and three thoracic radiologists on the basis of clinical symptoms, imaging findings, and laboratory/microbiological testing to exclude alternative etiologies, including infection. Associations between ATB exposure and CIP risk were evaluated using Fine-Gray competing-risk regression models.
resultsAmong 998 patients, 233 (23.3%) had ATB exposure and 142 (14.2%) developed CIP, with a median onset of 82 days (range, 9-552). After multivariable adjustment, ATB exposure was associated with a higher risk of CIP (subdistribution hazard ratio [sHR] = 9.05, 95% CI: 6.32-12.94, p < 0.001). The magnitude of association increased with CIP severity (mild to severe), with sHRs of 5.81, 11.40, and 12.46, respectively. Broad-spectrum ATBs (sHR = 7.27, 95% CI: 5.19-10.17, p < 0.001) and oral administration (sHR = 7.06, 95% CI: 5.07-9.84, p < 0.001) were associated with greater CIP risk than narrow-spectrum agents and intravenous administration, respectively. Patients exposed to ATBs exclusively after ICI initiation had the highest CIP risk (sHR = 11.19, 95% CI: 6.92-18.09, p < 0.001). Prophylactic ATB use was associated with worse outcomes among patients with CIP (adjusted p = 0.014).
conclusionIn lung cancer patients treated with anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy, ATB exposure was associated with a substantially increased risk of CIP. ATB use, particularly broad-spectrum and orally administered regimens, should be carefully evaluated, and ICI-treated patients receiving ATBs warrant close monitoring. In patients with established CIP, routine prophylactic ATB therapy should be used judiciously given its association with worse outcomes. </p>.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.