ArticleCerebrovascular diseases (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Population-Level Digital Stroke Surveillance: Building a Fair and Accurate ICD-10 Detection Model.
Article in Cerebrovascular diseases (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision (ICD-10), is widely used for clinical care, quality assurance, and stroke research. Its ubiquity across healthcare systems makes it an attractive foundation for digital health tools that can support stroke surveillance and population health monitoring. However, a major limitation is that stroke detection algorithms derived from ICD codes have been developed primarily in socially homogenous populations, raising concerns about generalizability and fairness across racially diverse populations.
methodsWe developed and validated an acute ischemic stroke (AIS) detection algorithm using Classification and Regression Tree (CART) supervised machine learning, using a diverse derivation cohort. Input variables consisted of diagnostic and procedural ICD-10 codes, stratified by position and presence on admission. The model was trained on 75% and tested on 25% of the derivation cohort and externally validated in a second tertiary institution serving patients living in predominantly underrepresented and socially vulnerable communities. Performance of the algorithm was measured by sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and Cohen's κ. Subgroup analyses were conducted by sex and race/ethnicity.
resultsIn the derivation cohort, the CART model achieved sensitivity of 96%, specificity of 90%, PPV of 99%, and κ = 0.78. Applied to the independent validation cohort, the algorithm identified 1,050 AIS cases and 1,664 non-AIS cases, with sensitivity 89%, specificity 95%, PPV of 92%, and κ = 0.84. Performance was comparable between women and men (κ = 0.80 for both), and strong across Black (κ = 0.81), Hispanic (κ = 0.76), and White (κ = 0.80) subgroups. Lower accuracy was observed in the Asian subgroup (κ = 0.73, PPV = 62%).
conclusionOur findings demonstrate that CART-based algorithms can provide accurate and interpretable AIS detection using ICD-10 data while explicitly addressing social fairness. The algorithm's reproducibility across independent and diverse populations highlights its potential as a low-friction, scalable, and cost-efficient tool for clinical care, surveillance, and quality improvement. Importantly, subgroup analyses underscore the necessity of ongoing fairness evaluation as performance varied by race/ethnicity, particularly in the Asian subgroup. Limitations include potential missed cases in the gold standard, lack of confidence intervals due to retrospective data, and dependence on local coding practices. This study shows that ICD-10-based machine learning algorithms, specifically CART, can serve as a model for developing an accurate and equitable digital health platform for AIS surveillance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.