Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41861057›Full record

ReviewJournal of innate immunity2026

The Challenges of Detecting Neutrophil CFTR.

Ryan Flannery, Rory Baird, Debananda Gogoi, Emer P Reeves

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of innate immunity, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ryan FlanneryDepartment of Anaesthesia and Critical Care Medicine, Pulmonary Clinical Science, RCSI University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dublin, Ireland.
Rory BairdDepartment of Anaesthesia and Critical Care Medicine, Pulmonary Clinical Science, RCSI University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dublin, Ireland.
Debananda GogoiDepartment of Anaesthesia and Critical Care Medicine, Pulmonary Clinical Science, RCSI University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dublin, Ireland.
Emer P ReevesDepartment of Anaesthesia and Critical Care Medicine, Pulmonary Clinical Science, RCSI University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dublin, Ireland, emerreeves@rcsi.ie.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCystic fibrosis (CF) is a hereditary disorder caused by mutations of the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) gene. The major causes of morbidity and mortality in CF are related to lung disease, involving neutrophil-dominated lung inflammation. SUMMARY: Whether the altered inflammatory response of neutrophils in patients with CF is an intrinsic defect due to a lack of CFTR protein expression, or alternatively, exacerbated by chronic exposure to infection and inflammation, is extensively debated. Fuelling this dispute are conflicting past studies on CFTR expression by neutrophils, with opposing results described at both the gene and protein level. This is pertinent in the era of CFTR modulator therapies, with clinicians and scientists exploring the impact of different CFTR mutation classes and CFTR modulators on neutrophil function. KEY MESSAGES: The focus of this article was to uncover the cause for the described disparity of data on neutrophil CFTR expression, by investigating methods utilised for CFTR detection and drawing consensus on the optimal protocol for identifying CFTR protein in neutrophils.

Indexed as

Cystic FibrosisCystic Fibrosis Transmembrane Conductance RegulatorNeutrophilsAnimalsHumansMutationCFTR protein, humanCystic Fibrosis Transmembrane Conductance RegulatorAntibodiesCell lysisCystic fibrosisCystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulatorNeutrophils

Identifiers

PMID41861057
PMCPMC13278731

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.