ArticlePloS one2026
Study on underwater noise characteristics and mechanism of discharge flow from wide-crested weir.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To provide theoretical guidance and technical support for mitigating underwater noise generated by discharge flow from wide-crested weirs, this study integrates physical experiments and numerical simulations. The effects of inflow, downstream static water depth, and weir height on underwater noise sound pressure level (SPL) and fluctuating pressure SPL were analyzed using correlation methods, and the time-frequency variation mechanism of underwater noise was investigated through wavelet analysis. Results show a significant positive correlation between underwater noise SPL and fluctuating pressure SPL, indicating that fluctuating pressure can be used to characterize underwater noise variation. Downstream static water depth exerts the greatest influence, with a negative correlation to SPL, whereas inflow and weir height have relatively smaller effects, both showing positive correlations. As inflow and weir height increase, and static water depth decreases, the mid-frequency range (400 ~ 600 Hz) exhibits high energy that decays rapidly. Fluctuating pressure at the measuring point is affected by the impingement of the main flow tongue on the downstream water body, vortex structure variation and breakup, and sound waves radiated from bubble collapse.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.