ArticlePloS one2026
Patient satisfaction among national health insurance enrollees in an accredited hospital of Kathmandu Valley: A cross-sectional, mixed methods study.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe national health insurance program was piloted in 2016 in Nepal with a political commitment of reducing out-of-pocket expenditure and improving access to quality healthcare services. However, it has been facing challenges of declining renewal rates and high drop-outs over the years. The study sought to assess patient satisfaction and factors influencing satisfaction among national health insurance enrollees.
methodA sequential explanatory mixed methods study was conducted in a provincial government hospital of Nepal. Patient satisfaction was first assessed among 391 insured patients, followed by in-depth interviews with seven healthcare providers to explore barriers to healthcare provision underlying the observed levels of patient satisfaction in quantitative survey. Both insured patients and providers were purposively selected. Quantitative data was analyzed using descriptive and bivariate analysis, as well as ordinal logistic regression, while qualitative data were analyzed thematically. Lastly, an integrative analysis was undertaken to synthesize and draw inferences from both the quantitative and qualitative findings.
findingsThe satisfaction was recorded as highest in the domain of interpersonal manner (79.54%) and lowest in the domain of accessibility and convenience (32.33%). Medicine availability stood as a strong predictor of patient satisfaction across multiple satisfaction domains which was validated by the qualitative findings. Qualitative findings revealed barriers to provision of healthcare including explanations to the observed levels of satisfaction: limited resources, medicine stock-outs, delays in reimbursement, and ex-post moral hazard among service users.
interpretationThe study gives insights into both patient-based and provider-based determinants of patient satisfaction. The findings provide recommendations for maintaining an uninterrupted medicine supply chain under the insurance benefit package and necessitate the allocation of enrollees according to the human resource capacity of health institutions which can influence the perceived quality of health services for the long-term sustainability of the insurance program.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.